FROM ENTERTAINMENT SCREEN TO NEWSREEL
THE VIOLENT ENTERTAINMENT CONNECTION
by Mikal Frazier, LMFT, LPC
"Mamma, when 'Power Rangers' comes on at the center we have to turn it
off." This was the comment of my college daughter who works at a
children's enrichment center summers and holidays. The children become so
rambunctious when this show airs that, to manage their behavior, they must
not allow the show to run. How does the violence in this children's
action show translate into aggressive behavior in its viewers?
In recent years, when we have received the shocking news of our children
killing children, the incidence of violence in the media and violent video
games has come under attack. More often than not these children have been
enacting some violence they have seen portrayed on the movie screen or
they have been heavily involved in playing violent video games. Again we
ask, "How does this happen?"
To begin examining this connection, it might be helpful to find a way to
categorize the different degrees of influence on decision-making. A
continuum can be helpful in determining this influence. On either end of
the continuum, we can place the immovables. On one end of the continuum
would be the children who are going to choose violence whether they are
influenced by media and games or not. These children are considered
immovable. Then on the other end of the continuum is another set of
immovables. These are the children who would never commit any act of
violence based upon the influence of the media or video games. But then
in the middle of the continuum are the children who are considered to be
the movables. These are children who might be influenced by the violence
in the media or violent video games. This answers the anecdotal comment,
"Well my son played those games every day from the time he was nine until
he was fifteen and he never considered violence." That may very well be,
but he would have been placed on the end of the continuum with the
immovables who would not be influenced by video games.
Because of the extreme violence we have seen our children commit, many
have looked at research to see if there is a connection between the
violence in media and games and the violence committed by these children.
Some research has been around for a very long time and other research is
emerging.
Researchers have known for several years that there was a connection
between the violence viewed on television by a husband and the number of
aggressive acts he committed toward his wife. In one particular study
husbands who viewed a violent program were significantly more aggressive
toward their wives than the control group who did not view this violent
programming. Certainly, such viewing would likely have a similar effect
on children.
One explanation of this connection is a process called systematic
desensitization. This approach is used to help individuals overcome
phobias and irrational fears. They are exposed systematically to the
distressing stimulus. As they become comfortable with a mild level of
exposure, then a higher level of exposure is provided, until they lose
their overactive response. As children view these disturbing scenes over
and over, they lose the natural response of aversion. They no longer have
that effect on them. They have moved a little bit closer to repeating the
behaviors.
Mental rehearsal is another process which can help explain the connection,
particularly between violent video games and aggressive behavior. Mental
rehearsal is usually done through imagery, in which the subject takes
himself through a behavior in his mind that he wants to develop. Athletes
and performing artists are using mental rehearsal to prepare for events
that cannot be easily simulated for in practice. How much more effective
might be the practice in the mind when a child is sitting and acting his
way through a video game. Studies have shown a child's heart rate and
blood pressure increase while playing a series of video games.
Though there are many other factors which contribute to these "high risk
kids without a conscience," we cannot deny the influence of the violence
we experience through the video games and media. When we observe children
spending large amounts of time with any form of violence, we have to
wonder if some of these processes are not at work.
* * * * *
WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING
- About Influences on Today's Parents
"What ranks as the most significant influence on parents? The largest was the impact of their parent's style, or their upbringing, mentioned by 45 % of today's parents. Other people such as friends, relatives, spouses - were significant inputs on parenting for one third (35%). Resources such as books, magazines, and articles were influential factors for one-third of respondents (34%). Only a small proportion of people named parenting experts. Among those mentioned most often were Dr. James Dobson of Focus on the Family (3%) and Dr. Benjamin Spock (1%)." (Barna Research Group. January 15, 1998).
- About Co-habitation Prior to Marriage
"Churches don't like to face up to the cohabitation reality. A report from the University of Wisconsin Center for Demography and Ecology says half of the population under age 40 has lived with an unmarried partner . . .. 'Living together before marriage increases the risk of breaking up after marriage,' according to the report titled, 'Should We Live Together? What Young Adults Need to Know about Cohabitation before Marriage.' Cohabitors who marry have a divorce rate 46 percent higher than those who live apart until marriage." - Judy Gross National Catholic Reporter. September 17, 1999.
- About Marriage and the Stability of Society
"If the institution of marriage ever falls from grace, our society will fall as well because there is no institution than can take it's place." - Utah Gov. Michael O. Leavitt - reported by Kathleen Parker, syndicated columnist. Her article appeared in several newspapers and was released on July 15, 1999.
* * * * *
PERCEPTIONS
"Substitution"
by Norman Bales
One of the most discouraging thoughts in Scripture is presented to us in Romans 3:23 - "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God." Two verses later, Paul presented one of the most encouraging thoughts in the Bible - "God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement through faith in his blood." The concept of the substitutionary atonement is uncomplicated and easy to explain, but it is very difficult to comprehend. What are the implications of Jesus becoming a voluntary substitute for our sins? And what does that great truth require of us? You can read our thoughts on the subject
at
http://www.allaboutfamilies.org/sh/percep36.html
If you have questions about marriage and family relationships, you can
"ASK THE COUNSELOR." Address your questions to Mikal Frazier. Her address is
mikal@allaboutfamilies.org
Norman's e-mail address:
nlbales@allaboutfamilies.org